
Joe Queenan asks readers what's in an adjective? in the New York Times Book Review [Jan. 21, 2007]. After feeling overwhelmed by the onslaught of good books in his world, he limited himself only to books called astonishing by a mainstream publication. This still left him with plenty to read and, perhaps more importantly, it left him with the type of book he prefers. Specifically, "books that go off like a Roman candle" as opposed to those that "veer toward the introspective, the arcane or the wise".
Are we reaching adjectival exhaustion? Are reviewers (movie, book, performance, music) hyperbolic in their praise? Are you seduced by a certain turn of phrase when looking for your next read? Personally, I'm a sucker for anything called a New York Times Notable Book.